Russia-Singapore Business Council and TV channel “Big Asia” signed a Cooperation Agreement

On March 27, 2018 Chairman of the Russia-Singapore Business Council Nikolay Volobuev and General Director of the TV channel “Big Asia” Alexander Lebedev signed an agreement on cooperation and information support. The agreement covers a formation of content for promotion of a positive image of Russian enterprises in Singapore and highlighting the Singapore experience in Russia. Created for a coverage of the cultural and economic cooperation with Asian countries, the TV channel “Big Asia” is planning feature series on Singapore and other countries of Southeast Asia. An important opportunity would be the III “Russia-Singapore Business Dialogue”, organized by the Council, and the general partner of which is the State Corporation Rostec. The forum will be held on April 17-18 in Singapore. Even more media opportunities are provided by the fact that the year 2018 is the anniversary year of a half-century diplomatic cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Singapore. The Russia-Singapore Business Council will take part in many events coincided with this occasion, while the TV channel “Big Asia” will have the opportunity to cover them.

 

Singapore’s PM invites Putin to take part in East Asia Summit

SINGAPORE, March 22. /TASS/. Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to attend the East Asia Summit (EAS), which will be held there in November, the Russian Embassy in Singapore informed TASS on Thursday.

“On behalf of the government of Singapore, I offer my warmest congratulations on your re-election as the President of the Russian Federation,” he said in his message of congratulations to the Russian leader.

“As Chair of ASEAN this year, Singapore will be hosting the 13th EAS in November. Russia is a valuable Dialogue Partner of ASEAN, and I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to attend the Summit,” the prime minister noted.

He recalled that “2018 marks the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Singapore and Russia.” “We share many common interests: Bilateral ties in areas such as trade, investment and training are growing. <…> Negotiations on the Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and Singapore are making progress,” he added.

The East Asia Summit brings together ten ASEAN countries (Brunei, Vietnam, Indonesia, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines) along with Russia, Australia, India, China, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Japan and the United States.
Source: http://tass.com/economy/995610

THE NUMBER OF COMPANIES REGISTERED ON THE PLATFORM RSTRADE HAS GROWN MORE THAN 40 TIMES! Interview with Sergey Pronin.

Interview with the Executive director of the Russia-Singapore Business Council Mr Sergey Pronin

– Sergey! What is meant by the omnitude of the Platform?

– Firstly, omnitude is versatility and multitasking. The Platform is not industry specific. It is not only export-oriented or, on the contrary, import-oriented. Moreover, it can be used as a convenient tool in the country. Secondly, the Platform is glocal. The term glocality, made up by political scientists about the EU, where global trends and universalization are combined with the interests of regions, countries, particular territorial subjects, suits well to the description of the ideology underlying the establishment of our Platform. The functionality of RSTrade allows to watch through the prism of global processes and in country/regional/industrial sections; both from the point of view of the manufacturer and from the point of view of service providers and consumers. Moreover, the Plarform operates in English, Russian, Chinese and Indonesian. Besides the integration of a number of Eastern and Western languages is planned. Thirdly, omnitude, paradoxically, means patriotism. The idea was Russian as well as the development and the design team. We are proud of the country where we were born and work and we hope that our activity will contribute to its development and return to the number of the leading technological states. Fourthly, this also means openness. Openness to new ideas – we are ready to refine something, change something, give up something. Openness is also the openness to cooperation. We are ready to partner up with companies from different countries. We are ready to integrate with the platforms, which, it would seem, should be our competitors. Simply together you can faster and more efficiently solve the emerging difficulties and break through the stone walls of misunderstanding and mistrust. Currently we are negotiating with a range of companies from Russia, Singapore, China and New Zealand on the possibility of integration and the creation of some new products and services. Fifthly, it is an independence. And again, I do not see any contradiction here with the fact that we are open to integration. We are open to cooperation, but to such interaction, where our opinion will be perceived and respected. I hope that in this quality – as equal partners – we will be perceived. And, perhaps, the last one, but not the least – it means a comfort. We hope that our partners feel comfortable working with the Platform and other tools offered. And we love comfort in a relationship. We really enjoy working with a number of service providers and communicate with them as friends, and we also feel ease with each other. In fact, we have two generations. We have such a wonderful youth. As it’s said, they are incomprehensible Ys and Zs, but in fact, excellent, smart, hard-working with new ideas and desire to realize themselves. They all are nearly 20-25 years old – it’s all ahead of them. They are our present and future. The second generation is about forty (I belong to this part of our team). And they are interesting and smart, and they are also experienced, they worked as top managers in major Russian and European corporations, but for some reason they left to join us. In fact, to the startup, to some kind of uncertainty. I think, not least because we feel comfortable together, and we possess the conviction that we will be able to achieve what we aspire to.

– Yes, a good team where everyone trusts each other is extremely important. I’m glad that you have this. And yet, Sergey, I would like to understand how the Platform was in progress, and where did this name come from?

– If you don’t mind, I’ll start with the last part of your question. RS – is acronym from «RussiaSingapore». Initially we thought to develop only this direction, then we realized that via Singapore there is an entrance to Southeast Asia. Afterwards it became clear that Russia is not in itself, it is a part of the Eurasian Economic Union and it turned out that representatives of other regions have an opportunity and interest in using the RSTrade Platform (www. rstradehouse.com – ed.). And how did things develop? Now it seems everything is simple and ordinary. All the experts of the Council met and began to think about how to cope more effectively with the task of expanding foreign trade turnover by weak forces. We thought about and brainstormed (even loudly called this evening a «strategic session»), used up several flip charts and decided that the usage of electronic resources would be the most efficient way. We decided to create the Platform. And immediately not a catalog, but a platform that would include insurance services, the capability to pay in different currencies, legal support services, financial support for sellers and buyers and later we realized a whole lot of other things. In a couple of months, we decided to add more investment passports of the regions, investment projects and a catalog of potential investors. One month later, one of the active members of the Council Interskol company made a request for a reliable supplier, that could produce the same-type products in a large volume of required quality. We helped to find it. But we realized that this can also be automated. This is how the section «contract manufacturing» appeared. Now it unites not only manufacturers and customers, but also scientific and engineering collectives, universities, start-up project teams, designers, companies that provide related services. I hope we can develop it earlier and better than others. In February last year, it was announced on the Board of the Council that we would create the Platform – and we were supported (morally). Already in May 2016, the Platform was presented in Sochi at the major summit «Russia – ASEAN». In November of the same year at the session of the High-Level Russia-Singapore Commission the launch of the Platform was announced, and we were introduced to the Protocol of decisions of this Commission. We began to attract companies and fill the product range and services. Then we presented the Platform at numerous conferences, forums, meetings in Russia and abroad. As a result, by the beginning of September we had about 500 companies, of which 100 were foreign companies. It was planned by the end of the year to increase the number of companies represented on the Platform to 1200-1400. However… in August of the same year within the framework of the EAEU Summit in Astana (Kazakhstan), we signed an agreement on the integration of services with the State Information Industry System operating under the auspices of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation. As a result of this integration, we had over 93,000 companies on the Platform. We cleared the base slightly, removed the duplications and so on. It turned out that on November 24, 2017 (a year after the launch) 81,360 companies were registered on the RSTrade Platform. This is a very serious basis. Now we need to imagine properly the opportunities of Russian companies abroad. This fact, as well as services, including unique ones, and the Platform itself should become the magnets that attract foreign partners. We believe, that their number should seriously exceed the number of represented domestic companies

– How much does it cost to be placed on the RSTrade Platform?

– Here everything is different. Generally, the registration and placement of some of the goods are free of charge. This applies to all languages and countries. Then there are different options: the additional payment for the number of flypages of goods or the acquisition of a license for the specific types of services or for the whole package. By the way, the first license for the whole set was acquired on August 1, 2017 by the State Corporation Rostec. We are proud that the largest Russian industrial corporation has chosen us. We hope, that our partnership will be mutually beneficial and will prove to be long-term.

– Sergey! And who came up with the Platform, if it, of course, has a certain founding father or a team of authors?

– There are an author and authors. If we talk about the author of the software – is Igor Antonov. We have known each other for a long time as far back the Zhukovsky Air Force Engineering Academy, which we graduated together, although different faculties. Together with his team he created a range of serious Internet sites and shops, wrote software that successfully operating in a number of wellknown companies. As for the content, the functions that needed to be automated, as well as the requirements for the most convenient format – there are a lot of authors of ideas, practically the whole composition of our company. The greatest contribution to this process, probably immodest, but still, was made by me and Andrey Bykov.

– We briefly talked about the history of the Platform. Apparently, the time has come to ask about the prospects for its development.

– If you think that I will present a development schedule chart or, as they say the “road map” for a period of 5-10 years, it is hardly possible. We, of course, realize, that we need to add languages, introduce some certain services, try to automate customs, strengthen or somewhere simply organize advertising for the Platform abroad and others. And we will do embark upon it. But I’m not sure, that these issues will be prioritized. It is impossible to foresee everything. Yes, because the market develops according to its own laws, we should follow the course of events or be half a step ahead. On the other hand, technologies are developing so rapidly that it is impossible to reliably predict in which direction the development will go: either in the direction of narrowing of the specialization, or the technologies of blockchain and big data will form a completely new architecture of the market. For now, no one can even predict whether cryptocurrency will be used on our Platform. And that is great! This creates such a wide window of opportunity that it is now not a window, but a whole gate. What I want also to say is that the digital economy is a driver, but you will not be satisfied with the figure. Well, there are always the first and second levels of Maslow. For us this means that we need to develop both online and offline directions. That is why, in December 2017 we have presented the Overseas Center for promotion of Russian high-tech companies and initiated its work. It is precisely in Singapore. A unique infrastructure for the promotion of goods and services to the global market has been created there. Also that is why we hold the III “RussiaSingapore Business Dialogue”. Innovation companies and investment projects will be presented there. Parties agreed to hold Youth panel of the Forum for the first time. We are looking forward to breathtaking work and we invite all the interested parties from Russia as well as South-East Asia to participate in the event.

Source: magazine RBG #36, 11 March 2018, 82-85

Presentation of the Russia-Singapore Business Council projects in Academpark of Novosibirsk

On March 14, 2018 the Director for Strategy and Development of the Russia-Singapore Business Council Mr Andrey Bykov, the Head of Novosibirsk representation office of the Council Mr Oleg Shorkin and the Technical director of the Singapore-based company Progression Pte. Ltd. Ms Winnie Teo paid a working visit to one of the largest technoparks in Russia – Academpark. Within its framework the current projects of the Council and the residents of Academpark were presented. The meeting was also attended by heads of companies – residents of the technopark, Director of Academpark JSC Mr Vladimir Nikonov and Deputy Director Mr Levan Tatunashvili. Furthermore, the Council experts got familiar with the structure of Academpark and visited a number of production facilities and research labs.

The meetings resulted in a preliminary agreement on the participation of Academpark residents with a collective stand in the Russian high-tech product exhibition this autumn in Singapore, the presentation of a number of resident start-ups at the III Russia-Singapore Business Dialogue, which will be held on April 17 in Singapore, as well as the intention to organize cooperation of Academpark residents with the international B2B Platform RSTrade, which is operated by the executive structure of the Council – “LLC Rstradehouse”.

IMG_20180314_151101-768x1024

 

Experts of the Council took part in the Conference of Medical Equipment Manufacturers in Tyumen

On March 12-13, 2018 the Director for Strategy and Development of the Russia-Singapore Business Council, Deputy General Director of LLC RSTradehouse Andrey Bykov took part in the annual conference of IAMT – International Association of Developers, Manufacturers and Users of Medical Equipment, which this year was held on the site of the Federal Center of Neurosurgery in Tyumen, Russia. The theme of the conference was “Digital Medicine, Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine. Opportunities for interaction between medicine, science and industry”. It is worth pointing out that a number of IAMT members are simultaneously the members of the Council and the management company of the Council was invited to join the IAMT.

IMG_20180312_165522-1024x768Mr. Bykov’s speech was mainly devoted to the potential of Southeast Asia markets for the Russian export of medical products, as well as the ongoing projects of the Council – the international B2B e-platform RSTrade (www.rstradehouse.com), Center for foreign promotion of Russian high technology companies and presentation of investment projects, opened in Singapore on the basis of Progression Pte. Ltd. (www.progression.sg), a business mission of Russian enterprises to Singapore, which will be held from 16 till 19 April 2018 and which will cover among others the telemedicine and export of medical equipment. By the way, within the framework of the business mission, III-rd “Russia-Singapore Business Dialogue” for the first time will be held in Singapore. The event was supported by the High-level Russia-Singapore Inter-Governmental Commission and is coincided with the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Russia and Singapore.

 

MFA Press Release: Speech By Minister For Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan During The Committee Of Supply Debate, 1 March 2018

Thank you Mr Chairman, now to discuss my day job at MFA. I want to thank all the Members for your very insightful contributions, comments. I want to commend Mr Low Thia Khiang, Ms Sylvia Lim, and Mr Pritam Singh for your also very constructive comments. In fact I listened to you very carefully and couldn’t find anything to disagree with you, and I am sure our foreign partners will notice that there is bi-partisan support for our approach to foreign policy, and indeed as a small open state we need the bipartisan support. So I am grateful for your constructive contributions, and for the bipartisan support we enjoy.

2. Now there are at least three key political issues if I could summarise: First, how do we manage our relations with the major powers given the rapidly evolving geo-political balance of power? The second set of issues is, as ASEAN Chairman, how do we strengthen ASEAN’s unity, Centrality and value proposition? And value proposition not just for outsiders but including our own people. The third political issue, is that Singapore is an open multi-racial, multi-religious city-state, a sovereign country in the heart of Southeast Asia. And how do we protect our unique identity, our domestic unity and our sovereignty from the inevitable foreign influence, and especially, I speak very frankly now, and especially, the primordial pull of ancestry, race, language and religion? And yet, as Mr Low mentioned yesterday, this cultural arbitrage is also our competitive advantage. So, we need to be aware of both opportunities and as well as the challenges that confront us because of our unique position.

3. In his Budget statement, Minister for Finance identified three major transformations, you have all heard about it: (i) the shift in the global centre of gravity towards Asia, and that basically as Mr Low says, is China, India, and ASEAN itself; (ii) second, the emergence of new technologies and the impact that will have on jobs, economy, and even attitudes to free trade; and (iii) third, an ageing population. The ageing population is especially an issue that confronts Singapore, confronts China, and the fact that in contrast, ASEAN as a whole 60% of ASEAN is below the age of 35.

4. Now these three trends present us with both opportunities and threats. And what we are actually trying to do is that as Asia grows, to make use of our unique identity, our unique position, and even our unique cultural arbitrage in order to ride on our nation’s growth and dynamism. But even as we do this, we must be mindful that there are multiple trans-boundary pitfalls. For instance, protectionist nationalism is on the rise. Terrorism is a clear and present threat. And in the midst of the digital revolution, cybersecurity breaches and “fake news” have eroded trust in institutions and divided societies. In fact, sometimes it has even become a tool of foreign policy.

5. Now, Singapore’s foreign policy given our unique position has always been guided by five key principles:

6. First, Singapore has to be successful, has to be vibrant; if we are not successful, we are not relevant. As Minister Mentor Lee said a long time ago, the world will not miss us if we disappear as a small state. There is no irreplaceable function that this small state provides the rest of the world.

7. Second, we must preserve our ability to make independent sovereign decisions based on our own national interests, and we must not become a vassal state. We are not for sale, and we are not going to be easily intimidated;

8. Third, Singapore aims to be a friend to all. What this means is that we do not wish to be forced to choose sides or to be caught in proxy battles;

9. Fourth, we promote, and we believe in a global, rules based order with international laws and international norms. And if you think about it, this is essential precisely because we are a small state; and

10. Fifth, Singapore must be a reliable, credible and consistent partner. For us, we don’t have the luxury of changing, flip-flopping, changing our views quickly overtime. Or saying a different thing to a different partner. We need to be reliable, credible and consistent.


China

11. I will start by addressing our relationships with the major powers. Mr Amrin Amin asked about our relationship with China. Many of you have also asked about US-China relations and the dynamics and how that affects us. I think Ms Jessica Tan asked that point.

12. With China, our relations, our track record of cooperation is deep, longstanding, and substantive. Last September, Prime Minister Lee visited Beijing at China’s invitation. The timing was significant; it was just a couple of weeks before China’s 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. We didn’t expect that they would have the bandwidth; nonetheless they invited the Prime Minister.

13. When Prime Minister met President Xi, President Xi emphasised that Singapore and China have no fundamental disagreements, no conflicting interests, and no differences on basic principles. I’m quoting him. We will convey the exact words in Chinese to the media later on. In fact, this is our own longstanding belief. We have always believed that a successful, stable China is good for our region. In fact, the rise of China and the elevation of hundreds of millions of people from abject poverty to the middle class is the biggest story of our lifetime.  And as Mr Low said yesterday, I think, as people with Chinese ancestry, at the cultural level and the emotional level, we must take pride and joy in that achievement. But we are also aware that we are not Chinese citizens, and Singapore is the only political entity, the only state in the world where Chinese are the majority, but we are not under the Communist Party of China.

14. We have always consistently supported China’s strategic economic development, and this is clearly evident from our unique Government-to-Government projects – Suzhou Industrial Park, Tianjin Eco-city, and more recently the Chongqing Demonstration Initiative. In fact, surprisingly, Singapore has been the largest foreign investor in China since 2013. Of course our role will have to evolve because unlike the past two and a half decades where we were investing and we were moving concepts and ideas into China, today China has become a net exporter of capital and technology. So our role inevitably must evolve to keep up with the times.

15. The other point that we must anticipate, and must expect from time to time, is that there will be issues of difference between China and Singapore. After all, we are two sovereign states with very different national circumstances. So we must expect differences in perspective, and we must not get flustered even when pressured. This is to be expected.  This is almost par for the course in international relations. Because you cannot expect two countries’ interests to be completely identical. In fact, I mean it’s no secret, I mean we’ve had some bumps along the way. But I would say that these episodes over the last two, two and a half years, have helped both sides to understand each other’s position better. I think it has made for a more mature relationship.

16. Currently, we are now negotiating an upgrade to the China-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. This will further enhance market access for our companies, create more jobs for Singaporeans.  Of course we also want to see more Chinese companies accessing opportunities in Southeast Asia through Singapore.

17. Our multi-faceted cooperation is constantly evolving. Both sides have identified new areas for cooperation. We have the JCBC, co-led by DPM Teo. We have now identified finance, legal, and judicial sectors. One example was the inaugural Singapore-China Legal and Judicial Roundtable held last year. And these initiatives will complement the existing high-level fora on economic cooperation, social governance and leadership. All again are incidentally chaired by DPM Teo. These extensive and high-level engagements between China and Singapore epitomise that long track record that builds trust and confidence.

18. The Belt & Road (B&R) Initiative is another major opportunity for cooperation. When I visited China in June last year, Foreign Minister Wang Yi and I agreed to establish three platforms to deepen Belt & Road cooperation.  First, on infrastructural connectivity; second, on financial connectivity and support; and third, to look for opportunities for third-party collaboration, including joint training for officials from other Belt & Road countries to work and exploit opportunities that the Belt & Road Initiative provides.

19. The potential is huge. Singapore accounted for 85% of total inbound investments to China from Belt & Road countries, and nearly one-third of China’s outbound investments to B&R countries actually flow through Singapore. I didn’t quite believe these figures. I double checked with my staff, they said yes, these figures are from China.

20. We are working together to connect the overland Silk Road Economic Belt with the Maritime Silk Road through a new “Southern Transport Corridor”, which links Chongqing in Western China to the Beibu Gulf in Guangxi. Our businesses can expand into Western China through Chongqing, just as Chinese companies can use Singapore as a gateway into Southeast Asia. This creates a “mutual hub effect”, it benefits businesses and benefits people. And as I said, by interconnecting the overland Silk Road with the Maritime Silk Road, it still maintains Singapore as a hub.


The US

21. The US is a longstanding, close strategic partner and we have had mutually-beneficial relations over the last 52 years.

22. Defence ties form the backbone of the bilateral relationship. Let me give a recent example. When Hurricane Harvey struck last year, we quickly deployed four RSAF CH-47 Chinook helicopters and 34 of our own servicemen from our training detachment in Grand Prairie, Texas to help with the relief effort. The RSAF worked seamlessly with their American counterparts because of the regular training between both sides. In fact we have 1,000 SAF personnel training in various detachments in Arizona, Idaho and Texas every year in F15s, F16s, Chinooks and Apaches. No other foreign state has more troops on US soil.

23. Our strong trade, investment, and business ties with the US are underpinned by the 2004 US-Singapore FTA. In 2016, the US was the top foreign direct investor in Singapore, with investment stock worth S$281 billion. The US is Singapore’s largest trading partner in services, and third largest trading partner in goods. Our total trade with the US stood at almost S$140 billion.

24. There are over 4,200 US companies here, which help create good jobs for Singaporeans and US exports to Singapore and Singapore investments in the US support over 250,000 American jobs. This is a statistic we share with President Trump to make the point that he has real skin in the game in Southeast Asia, especially in Singapore. Singapore is the second largest Asian investor in the US, second after Japan, and Asia’s number one buyer of US commercial property. I think these are investments.

25. Last month’s Singapore Airshow showcased our strong defence and economic cooperation. The US fielded the largest foreign delegation with 170 exhibitors. US aerospace exports to Singapore totalled almost US$5 billion in 2016.

26. The deep economic linkages have given Singapore access to US markets and US technology, and allow Singaporeans to learn with and from the best in the US including the academic and research institutes.

27. PM’s visit to Washington last October reinforced these fundamentals. President Trump described Singapore as one of the US’ “closest strategic partners in Asia”. President Trump has accepted PM’s invitation to visit Singapore later this year.  We look forward to receiving him.

28. There have been questions about the US commitment to the liberal world order and free trade as we know it. One statistic which I think that members of the house should be aware of is that in 1960, the US GDP was 40% of global GDP. In 2017, although the US GDP has grown, as a proportion it has shrunk to 25% of the global GDP. Now the reason for giving you this statistic is to make you all appreciate that it is a completely legitimate political exercise within the domestic US politics to ask why they should unilaterally underwrite the global world order as we have known it for the past 70 years when their share is shrinking. I say this because you need to look for deeper trends beyond the headlines and the personalities. But the point we make is that the US has had a headstart here, the US has enormous investments in Southeast Asia, the US has significant reservoirs of goodwill. It is theirs to lose even as they sort out their domestic political questions.


US-China

29. Now for us, because of our close relationship with both the US and China, we hope that there will be a stable US-China relationship because if they maintain the peace, there will be peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific.

30. We enjoy good relations with both. We want and are in fact well-suited to be part of the common circle of friends. Remember my earlier point about not being forced to choose sides.

31. So we must anticipate that there will be an element of competition between the US and China. But the big difference from, say, the Cold War is that the US and China are highly interdependent in a way which was never present in the relationship between the Soviet Union and the US.

32.  So we hope that both sides will see that there is too much to lose by confrontation and by conflict. We of course view a trade war with great concern. We have seen some early salvos, for instance, the tariffs that the US is imposing on solar panels, even washing machines. The target was China and Korea, but because Singapore also makes solar panels, we also become collateral damage. This illustrates the danger of a full-blown trade war.


ASEAN Chairmanship

33. Let me turn to ASEAN.  It has always been a cornerstone for peace and prosperity in our region. ASEAN unity enlarges our strategic and economic space, amplifies our voices on the international stage, and promotes an open and rules-based inclusive regional architecture. The alternative, if we did not have ASEAN, is to become a bunch of vassal states operating on the principle of “might is right”, and being an arena for proxy wars.  I think Mr Low also mentioned that yesterday.  Therefore, ASEAN is a cornerstone of our foreign policy.  We will work to strengthen the ASEAN-led regional architecture by working with our ASEAN Member States and our dialogue partners.

34. Now, our dialogue partners have proposed various regional initiatives.  For instance, I mentioned the Belt and Road Initiative just now. More recently, you may have heard the US, Japan, and India talking about a Free and Open Indo-Pacific. Without getting into the details, I would just like to share with you how I view all these proposals.  I basically ask three questions.

35. First question – whatever the proposal is, whatever the label is – what does your proposal mean for ASEAN Centrality and unity?  In other words, will these initiatives keep ASEAN at the core of the regional architecture of Southeast Asia or will they – wittingly or unwittingly – pull ASEAN apart and force us to choose sides? That’s my first question.

36. Second question – whatever the initiative is – does it facilitate trade, investment, infrastructure and connectivity? Clearly, an economic agenda because ASEAN has got such growth potential in the next two to three decades. Trade, investment, and connectivity is strategy.

37. Third question – whatever the initiative – does it support a world order based on international law? And for us in particular, because we are a port, an island, a city-state, 1982 UNCLOS is sacrosanct.

38. Our Chairmanship of ASEAN is an important opportunity for us in our own small way to make a positive contribution to a substantive and forward-looking agenda. Ms Sylvia Lim mentioned her concern that according to a survey, only 13% of Singaporeans expressed interest in ASEAN.  I share your concerns but my own take is that I think we take it for granted. After 50 years, we have taken it for granted that that there is no war in Southeast Asia.  We transact with each other, have mutual interdependence, investments, trade.  When we have disputes, we go to the international courts and we resolve disputes according to international law.  That’s at the political level.

39. Actually, if you look at the people level, you ask yourselves: tourism numbers – Singaporeans are great travellers and ASEAN is our immediate neighbourhood.  Huge numbers of Singaporeans travel to ASEAN.  You look at schools, and you ask your schools – lots of trips.  On service learning, the SIF – Singapore International Foundation – volunteers. Even when you look at both formal and informal groups, and what our students and our young people do in the more rural areas, even in Indochina.

40. If you ask our businesses what their investments are across Malaysia and Indonesia, actually if you do a proper catalogue, I think we are fully invested in ASEAN.  It is just that I think we take it for granted but I take your point that we need to raise the flag of ASEAN more. I’m always intrigued – if you go to any ASEAN Member State embassy, you will see them flying two flags – the national flag and the ASEAN flag.  But you don’t often see the ASEAN flag in Singapore, so I take your point that we do need to fly the ASEAN flag more, and to make our people appreciate how important ASEAN is to us.

41. Our Chairmanship themes for this year are “resilience” and “innovation”. It expresses our hopes for ASEAN to meet future challenges, particularly to deal with emerging issues like digital disruption. After all, this is what we are also doing at the local level – how do we deal with the digital revolution – in fact, this is an opportunity for us to do more with our fellow ASEAN members.

42. One key initiative is the ASEAN Smart Cities Network (ASCN). We envisage this as a platform for ASEAN cities to share best practices, urban solutions, new technologies.  But I think the most important thing is that we are looking for interoperability, whether you are talking about e-payments systems, ASEAN single trade windows, facilitation of travel, and facilitation of even the ASEAN self-certification regime to make it easier to export goods and services.  We want to do all this because in fact there is tremendous potential for intra-ASEAN trade.

43. Someone also asked about the Model ASEAN Extradition Treaty. Negotiations are not over yet but making good progress.

44. As ASEAN Chair, we will have to work hard to maximise our common ground and keep ASEAN united. Let me also tell you very honestly, that it will be difficult. So for instance, some members – I think it was Louis Ng and Christopher de Souza – asked about the situation in Rakhine State.

45. Now Members are familiar that one of the founding principles of ASEAN is non-interference in domestic affairs. We cannot directly intervene but I would say that this is a humanitarian disaster of the highest order.  Secondly, if this problem is not resolved properly, we will end up creating yet another flashpoint and yet another sanctuary for extremists and terrorists, and it will become another trans-boundary threat. So in our own quiet behind-the-scenes way, we have to try to make a positive difference.

46. ASEAN agreed to mobilise the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance to deliver assistance to the affected communities in Myanmar, and when we delivered it, we insisted that it should be delivered without discrimination. All communities who need help, should receive our help.

47. To date, the Centre has delivered at least two loads of relief supplies worth US$500,000 to the Myanmar government, and we also deployed an ASEAN Emergency Response and Assessment Team to assist in humanitarian relief efforts.

48. We had an ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Retreat last month. Myanmar gave us a briefing and we urged Myanmar to continue implementing the recommendations made by the Advisory Commission on Rakhine State, which was led by former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. We encouraged the expeditious commencement of the voluntary return of the refugees but it has to be done in a safe, secure and dignified way without undue delay. Frankly, these are easier said than done when you consider what has already transpired on the ground.

49. We have also emphasised that the responsibility for resolving this complex problem ultimately rests with Myanmar and the stakeholders within Myanmar.

50. Singapore and ASEAN will continue to do our part by encouraging all parties to work towards a long-term and comprehensive political solution, and to create a conducive environment for the affected communities to rebuild their lives. So this is an example. There will always – from time to time – be an issue that tests our fundamental principles and our ability to make a positive contribution.


ASEAN-China and SCS Code of Conduct

51. Another area we are focused on right now is the ASEAN-China relationship.

52. We are reaching the end of our third year of our coordinatorship of the ASEAN-China Dialogue Relationship. In these three years, we have been able to strengthen the relationship, despite the challenges, and it will culminate with 2018 designated as the “ASEAN-China Year of Innovation”.

53. 2018 marks the 15th Anniversary of the ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership, which we will commemorate with a statement on the ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership Vision 2030. This sets a roadmap for the future of the strategic partnership.

54. ASEAN and China will also commence negotiations on the Code of Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea this year. This is a significant milestone. It will serve, we hope, to reinforce the rules-based regional order. As ASEAN-China coordinator, we will continue to be an honest broker. We will work closely with all sides to narrow the differences. I cannot promise it will be delivered soon because of the complexities involved.


Economic Integration

55. Ms Sun Xueling asked about economic integration and free trade. You know, actually, free trade all over the world is unfairly blamed for economic problems that, in fact, are the result of technological disruption. We believe, and we have been discussing this during the Budget debate, that the answer is not to build walls or to retreat from global competition. We believe we have to double down on re-structuring our economies, upgrading skills of our people, supporting innovation and pursuing business opportunities globally.

56. This is why the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is important and this was launched in 2015. I have been told that so far, that plan had 609 measures and 536 of them have been implemented. But without getting into the fine print, the point is that the AEC is an attempt to enable our companies to better access ASEAN’s dynamic market of more than 600 million people, where, as I said earlier, 60% are below the age of 35 and there is enormous investment opportunity.

57. Fundamentally, I am glad that we do not argue about this in Singapore because, in Singapore, trade is our lifeline.  No other state has a trading volume that is three-and-a-half times its GDP. It is trade that allows our companies to expand beyond our small market, and to create jobs for Singaporeans. Although I have said that the global consensus is eroding, the outlook is actually not so bleak. For instance, the 11 remaining Parties of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have concluded talks, and on 8th of March in Chile, Minister Lim Hng Kiang will have to make a long journey to sign the CPTPP which stands for the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Frankly, this has exceeded my expectations.  However, even with just 11 members, because the US had pulled out, it still represents about 500 million people and a $10 trillion economy collectively. We will continue to leave the door open for the US and we will wait and see.

58. In the meantime, we also hope to make substantive progress this year on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This RCEP comprises 10 ASEAN Members and the 6 Dialogue Partners whom we have existing free trade agreements with.  That means India, China, Japan, Korea, Australia and New Zealand.  Some people have asked us if the CPTPP and RCEP are rival blocks or rival agreements.  We say no.  As far as Singapore is concerned, these are complementary building blocks because what we envisage ultimately is a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific.

59. Members also know that we just signed a free trade agreement with Sri Lanka last month. There are some complexities involved with the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement that we are sorting out.  It has been signed and it just a question of ratification.

60. Singapore is an associate member of the Pacific Alliance, which consists of Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru.  Mercosur is also looking at exploring a free trade agreement with Singapore, as a step, ultimately, perhaps, to a regional agreement between Mercosur and ASEAN.  I have been in this business long enough to know that when I used to go to South America 10-15 years ago, they were not interested in free trade agreements with us or with ASEAN. Yet, the mood has changed. The tide has changed.

 

Regional Partners

61. Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim asked about our immediate neighbours. So let me report first on Malaysia and Indonesia. You know these are our closest neighbours, of utmost importance. And with the right spirit of cooperation, we embark on win-win initiatives, strengthen bilateral ties and allow our companies to tap on the dynamic Malaysian and Indonesian economies.

62. But, you know as well as I do, our relations will always be complex, and issues will surface from time to time. When they do, again, have a sense of perspective. Don’t let a single issue derail the overall relationship.

63. Malaysia. With Malaysia, we have continued to set new milestones recently. At the 8th Singapore-Malaysia Leaders’ Retreat in January, PM Lee and Prime Minister Najib Razak officiated the opening of the Marina One and DUO joint venture developments, which have a combined Gross Development Value of S$11 billion.

64. Members will remember that these projects came about as sequelae to the settlement of the Points of Agreement on the Malayan Railways (KTM) land.

65. We also signed the Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link Bilateral Agreement. The RTS Link, when completed in 2024, will dramatically change the way hundreds of thousands of travellers shuttle between Johor Bahru and Singapore each day.

66. Then we also have the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore High Speed Rail, which is also progressing well. The tender for the Assets Company was called last December; it will close in June. The results of the tender will be announced in about a year’s time, and will be conducted in a fair, open and transparent manner.

67. Such long-term strategic projects enhance our inter-dependence, give us all a greater stake in each other’s success, and demonstrate the tangible benefits of stable and positive ties.

68. There have been questions even about Pedra Branca at the International Court of Justice. Let me just put it very simply, we will not let this issue define or derail our relationship. In fact, the most important point is this – that when we have a difference, we seek peaceful resolution according to international law.

69. I should remind members that Malaysia will soon hold its General Election. Again, we know from past history that every time election rhetoric heats up, sometimes Singapore becomes part of the political fodder. Now, on our part, we must ensure that we do not get drawn into their domestic politics, nor will we allow the import of foreign countries’ politics into Singapore.

70. Indonesia. With Indonesia, our bilateral cooperation remains deep and multi-faceted. Last year, Singapore and Indonesia commemorated “RISING50” – the 50th anniversary of our diplomatic relations. And we have been working to enhance economic linkages in digital economy, tourism and skills training.

71. Singapore remained Indonesia’s top foreign investor in 2017, with realised investments at US$8.4 billion. We are each other’s second biggest source of tourists.

72. The recently-launched joint venture in Central Java, the Kendal Industrial Park, is doing well. 36 companies have committed as tenants, investments valued at over S$600 million, and with the potential to create 5,000 jobs.

73. We are also working with Indonesia on a digital industry cluster in Batam and to participate in the tech start-up ecosystem in Jakarta, which by the way, has quite a thriving digital scene.

74. We also continue to work closely to strengthen counterterrorism efforts.

75. And since I used to be Environment Minister, I need to say that we appreciate the concerted efforts of President Joko Widodo and the provincial leaders to manage the haze situation. And this year, it is better. We are committed to working with Indonesia to tackle this transboundary issue.

76. I just visited Jakarta last month. Good series of meetings with my counterpart Ibu Retno Marsudi and other Indonesian leaders across the political spectrum.

77. There is consensus across the board that the Singapore-Indonesia partnership is valuable and brings mutual benefits, and so long as we can continue this positive tenor, we can manage the inevitable differences which still remain.

78. Overall, we believe in the “Prosper Thy Neighbour” policy. And we want Indonesia and Malaysia especially to succeed. Good for us, good for the region.

79. Brunei. Brunei is a close and special friend.

80. We celebrated the 50th Anniversary of the Currency Interchangeability Agreement (CIA) in July 2017, during the fourth State Visit of His Majesty the Sultan. The CIA is a unique long-standing arrangement that has brought economic benefits for both Brunei and Singapore.  It has lowered business costs and allowed us to inter-operate.

81. PM Lee attended the Sultan’s Golden Jubilee celebration last October, which was another occasion to reaffirm our close relationship.

82. You may have heard that Brunei had a Cabinet reshuffle recently. We are familiar with many of the new Ministers because we have had regular exchanges over the years. We are looking forward to work with the new team to further take our special relationship to new heights.

83. We continue to foster close ties among the younger generation of Bruneian and Singapore leaders through the annual Young Leaders’ Programme, led by His Royal Highness Crown Prince Billah and DPM Teo Chee Hean.

84. There were some questions on our relationships with other key partners Japan, Australia, and India.

85. Japan. With Japan our relations are close and multi-faceted. Last month, we hosted Foreign Minister Taro Kono. DPM Tharman Shanmugaratnam visited Japan in February, and PM will be there in June. We are elevating cooperation in traditional sectors like trade and connectivity, and also examining emerging areas like science and technology.  They have a Japan Society 5.0 vision which is very similar to our Smart Nation, and because of their lead with technology we are looking at this as another platform.  And of course both of us are ageing societies and that is another common challenge.  We will have to see how we can reorganise our societies and use technology to deal with this.

86. Australia. Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull made an official visit in June 2017 for the 2nd Annual Leaders’ Summit; and in fact PM Lee will be going to Australia later this month. Our close friendship with Australia is underpinned by shared historical experiences and shared strategic perspectives. We elevated our ties with Australia to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in 2015, and implementation is well on track.  One point I would just highlight – no other country provides as much space for us to train in as Australia.  When we go there it is multiple times the size of Singapore.

87. India. Mr Low mentioned the emerging importance of India.  India’s population will exceed that of China I think by 2024, and unlike China, India remains young.  India hosted the ASEAN-India Commemorative Summit in New Delhi in January, which PM attended. We have made good progress on the India-Singapore Strategic Partnership, particularly in smart cities and defence. PM Narendra Modi is scheduled to deliver the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue in June this year. We look forward to discussing ways to further expand our bilateral ties and SMS Maliki will give you more details.

 

Future Challenges

88. Let me conclude by saying that  our diplomatic relations actually are in good order, and you would have noticed actually I have been more relaxed last year than in the previous year; but we need to stay alert to known unknowns and unknown unknowns – “wild cards”. What are these known unknowns? The tensions on the Korean Peninsula. Singapore has been implementing the UN Security Council Resolutions fully and faithfully. We hope that the recent talks between the ROK and the DPRK will help arrive at a peaceful resolution and ultimately we hope that there will be a denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula.

89. How we in Singapore weather external shocks actually boils down to our domestic resilience and unity.

 

Domestic Support

90. I think it was Mr Sitoh Yih Pin who asked about domestic support for foreign policy, and so have the Members of Parliament from the Workers’ Party. Ms Joan Pereira asked about our public diplomacy efforts. Your questions are really centred on whether we can maintain domestic support and unity for our foreign policy. And that is why I said I’m grateful there is bipartisan support in this Chamber.

91. International issues will increasingly be dragged into the domestic discourse. Our open, multi-racial, multi-religious society gives many opportunities for foreign actors who are trying to test our resolve, or even undermine our unity.

92. Singaporeans must be well-informed, not only about the multitude and diversity of views, but also the corresponding trade-offs we have to weigh up. Singaporeans have to be discerning towards “fake news” and not allow ourselves to be distracted and divided.

93. I wanted to quote our former President Dr Tony Tan at the S Rajaratnam Lecture last year. He said when someone comes to you with a message, take some time, reflect on the message, and ask yourself what it means. Think carefully about who stands to benefit from the proposed message, and whether it is in Singapore’s own national interest.

94. On this front, MFA has been stepping up its outreach to Singaporeans at various levels. And we do need strong and informed support from the public because foreign policy begins at home.

 

MFA

95. I also want to thank Mr Desmond Choo and Mr Cedric Foo for their questions on MFA officers and resources. I think you all have noticed that MFA is the Ministry with the smallest budget. It’s okay, I’m not asking for more. I’m actually very proud to have some of the most talented and dedicated officers. Over the years, MFA has worked on a rigorous selection system and an equally rigorous nurturing system. This includes bringing in mid-career entrants[1] with the relevant skillsets and experience. It’s up to us optimise to our limited resources to provide our officers with continuous training. But I think most of all, what really motivates our officers is that sense of meaning and significance – that they are advancing Singapore’s interest, protecting sovereignty, expanding opportunities for business, looking after Singaporeans who get into trouble, and that’s especially for our consular services, which for most Singaporeans, is the public, human face of MFA.

96. I would add, the MFA families pay a very heavy price. The trailing spouse, who has to compromise his or her career, the children of MFA diplomats who are deprived of a Singaporean childhood. We should bear in mind that this is a family enterprise. What I’ve tried to do in my time there is to give credit and to emphasise family, and tell my officers that they never need to be embarrassed about saying that they need to do something or need to take some time off because they need to address family needs. I’m sure you all agree.

 

Conclusion

97. So let me conclude by saying we must maintain a realistic view of the world as it is, not as we hope it to be. We have to seek the right balance, promote regional unity and pursue global economic opportunities wherever these arise. In terms of style, we will continue to adopt a quiet, friendly but firm style of diplomacy. We will be honest, competent, reliable and constructive partners.

98. Most of all, diplomacy begins at home. Our foreign policy rests on a domestic consensus on our national interests. I will continue to work with all Members in this House to reach out to Singaporeans, to build a deeper appreciation of the fundamental truths, the hard truths, that underpin our foreign policy, and to develop a shared national instinct against external attempts to pressure, influence, or divide us.

 

.    .    .    .    .

 

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
SINGAPORE
1 MARCH 2018

Source: https://www1.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2018/03/Min-COS-2018-Speech

The nation that thrived by ‘nudging’ its population

Singapore has grown from almost nothing in 50 years. And this well-regarded society has been built up, partly, thanks to the power of suggestion.

“Kopi lah,” says the elderly Singaporean man, leaning against the counter of the café. The stall holder hands him a bag filled with thick, creamy coffee sweetened with condensed milk. “Do people ever ask for healthier options?” I ask the woman behind the counter. She laughs. “Getting better,” she says, suggesting that people are creatures of habit.

As I wander through the market, the air dense with the smells of noodle soup, barbequed pork and sweet satay, I notice red stickers dotted on various stalls. “Healthier options available here”, reads one. “We use healthier oil”, reads another. It’s part of the Health Promotion Board’s Healthy Dining Programme where food and beverage providers get a grant if they provide healthier options for diners. It’s an indication of the small but not insignificant ways the government ‘nudges’ the population to make better choices.

Ever since the city state on the southern tip of the Malay Peninsula passed the ripe old age of 50, the administration has been keen to look outwards, to learn from and collaborate with other countries in order to shape its future. One such strategy has been to collaborate with the UK government’s Behavioural Insights Team, nicknamed the “Nudge Unit”, which uses the Nobel Prize-winning concept of “nudge theory”. This is based around the idea that people can make better choices through simple discreet policies while still retaining their freedom of choice. Nudge theory is certainly de rigeur among policy makers across the world at the moment but Singapore has actually been using similar strategies long before it became fashionable. And to understand why, you have to look back at the country’s history.

It is known for being the epitome of order and efficiency and, more importantly, the place where chewing gum is banned. Today it is one of the financial centres of the world but this has been hard-won. Following its expulsion from the Federation of Malaysia and subsequent independence in 1965, Singapore was left riddled with many socio-economic problems. Along with unemployment, lack of education and sub-standard housing, it was also a country lacking natural resources and land.

The man who took on this gargantuan task was the late Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. He recognised that Singapore had to change in order to thrive. “We knew that if we were just like our neighbours, we would die. Because we’ve got nothing to offer against what they have to offer. So we had to produce something which is different and better than what they have. It’s incorrupt. It’s efficient. It’s meritocratic. It works,” he told the New York Times.

Безымянный
In Singapore’s Hawker Centre, healthier options are cheaper than comfort food

And in order to make it work, the government had to take control in order to develop a society in which people’s material needs were met. They built high-rise social housing called HDB’s, and industrialisation and inward foreign investment resulted in job creation. Slowly this infant nation started to take shape.

Numerous public campaigns were established in order to lay down foundations of as well as create a sense of social identity in a disparate and multicultural population. The early campaigns were about improving the cleanliness and hygiene of the environment. “Keep Singapore Clean” and “Plant Trees” were common slogans that spearheaded these campaigns. Other campaigns focussed on family planning urging people to “Stop at 2”. As Singapore became more affluent, the National Courtesy Campaign was implemented as well as one encouraging people to speak Mandarin to create a more cohesive, considerate and civilised society.

In 1986, Lee Kuan Yew said “I am often accused of interfering in the private lives of citizens. Yes, if I did not, had I not done that, we wouldn’t be here today… we would not have made economic progress, if we had not intervened on very personal matters – who your neighbour is, how you live, the noise you make, how you spit, or what language you use. We decide what is right.”

This strategy paid off within 50 years, and the economy has become one of the most innovative and business-friendly in the world. But while Singapore still loves a public campaign, it has moved toward a more nuanced approach of influencing the behaviours of its inhabitants.

Nudging the population isn’t uniquely Singaporean; more than 150 governments across the globe have tried nudging as a better choice. A medical centre in Qatar, for example, managed to increase the uptake of diabetes screening by offering to test people during Ramadan. People were fasting anyway so the hassle of having to not eat before your testing was removed. It was convenient and timely, two key components to a successful nudge.

Towns in Iceland, India and China have trialed ‘floating zebra crossings’ – 3D optical illusions which make the crossings look like they are floating above the ground designed to urge drivers to slow down. And in order to get people to pay their taxes in the UK, people were sent a letter saying that the majority of taxpayers pay their taxes on time which has had very positive results. Using social norms make people want to conform.

In Singapore some of the nudges you come across are remarkably simple. Rubbish bins are placed away from bus stops to separate smokers from other bus users. Utility bills display how your energy consumption compares to your neighbours. Outdoor gyms have been built near the entrances and exits of HDB estates so they are easy to use, available and prominent enough to consistently remind you. Train stations have green and red arrows on the platform indicating where you should stand so as to speed up the alighting process. If you opt to travel at off-peak times (before 0700), your fare is reduced.

1
Singapore’s National Steps Challenge has been a huge success

And with six out of 10 Singaporeans eating at food courts four or more times a week, getting people to eat healthier is also a priority. As well as the Healthier Dining Programme, some places make it cheaper to take the healthy option. If you’re determined to eat that Fried Bee Hoon at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, for example, you’re going to have to pay more for it.

The National Steps Challenge, which encourages participants to get exercising using free step counters in exchange for cash and prizes, has been so successful that the programme name has been trademarked. This form of gamifying is one of the more successful ways of engaging users in achieving objectives. Massive queues to collect the free fitness tracker demonstrated the programme’s popularity.

And it’s not just in tangible ways that nudges are being rolled out. Citizens pay into a mandatory savings programme called the Central Provident Fund at a high rate. This can be accessed for healthcare, housing and pensions as a way to get people to save long-term because evidence has shown that people are too short-sighted when it comes to financing their future.

And as the government looks to increase the population 30% by 2030, the city-state’s ageing population and declining birth rate is a problem. The Baby Bonus Scheme goes some way to encouraging parents to have more children by offering cash incentives. Introduced in 2001, the scheme means that all Singapore citizens who have a baby get a cash gift as well as a money into a Child Development Account (CDA) which can be used to pay for childcare and healthcare. The more children you have, the more money you get – since March 2016 you get a cash gift of $8,000 SGD (£4,340) for your first child and up to $10,000 (£5,430) for the third and any subsequent children, as well as money into your CDA.

So do people like being nudged? Is there any cultural difference in the way people react to being swayed toward a ‘better’ choice or behaviour? Given the breadth of the international use of behavioural insights, there is relatively little research done into whether people are happy about it. What research is available from Europe and the United States suggests that people are largely approving as long as it fits in with their values and interests. For example, when it comes to making calorie content more readily available in fast food restaurants or being asked whether you want to be an organ donor when you get your driving licence, people are largely supportive.
2             In countries with high trust in government – like Singapore – response to nudges is usually positive

In a study that looked at how people in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Russia, South Africa, and South Korea reacted, the results largely correlated to European and United States results with a few exceptions. China and South Korea showed “spectacularly high approval rates” while Japan showed “significantly lower approval ratings” in line with results from Denmark and Hungary in a European study.

Although there is no definitive research into why this is the case, it is suggested that support for nudges are higher in countries where the issues addressed are of direct concern to the citizens – air pollution in China for example. A potential correlation also has been drawn between support for nudges and the level of trust in government. Hungary, which had one of the lowest levels of support for nudges, also has a low level of trust in its government – only 28% according to the OECD. China, on the other hand, had overwhelmingly positive attitudes to nudges and also a high level in trust in the government.

Although Singapore was not included in the worldwide study, the level of trust in government is high and could possibly indicate that support for nudges is then also high.

So what is the future for nudges in Singapore? According to the Innovation Lab – a multi-disciplinary team within the Public Service Division that designs public policies and services from the viewpoint of citizens and stakeholders – the future is digital.

A spokesperson says that citizens expect public services to catch up or do better than the private sector when they go digital. People already use devices such as chat bots and virtual or augmented reality interfaces in the private sector. They want the public sector to follow suit.
3

                                       Singapore quickly had to build public housing blocks after independence

There is a sense that public services are benchmarked against people’s experiences with the commercial sector. The way in which we engage with the world is becoming faster, more hi-tech and arguably more removed from the real world. You only have to look at the popularity of the game Pokemon Goto see the buzz around virtual reality. And so the Singaporean government doesn’t want to get left behind.

As I step back into the shiny metropolis surrounded by the glinting metal and glass of 30-storey high rises, it’s easy to forget that just over 50 years ago none of this would have been here, not even the land in some areas. And while not everyone is a fan of such an intimate social contract between state and citizen, there’s no denying that Singapore has been master of its own destiny. Through nudges and careful ‘choice architecture’, this Little Red Dot has ploughed its own path.

Source: http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180220-the-nation-that-thrived-by-nudging-its-population